Cannon Kingsley vs Martin Beran Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W L L L W W L L
Form
L W W L L W W L W LHead To Head: Kingsley 1 - 0 Beran
They have played 1 sets in total, with Kingsley winning 1 and Beran winning 0. The last match between Kingsley and Beran was at the M15 East Lansing, 22-11-2019, Second, I.hard with Cannon Kingsley getting the victory 5-3 ret..
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Cannon Kingsley | 1 |
| Martin Beran | 0 |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-3 ret. |
Stats 
Cannon Kingsley
Player
Martin Beran
68%
(
15 of
22)
1st Serve %
45%
(
15 of
33)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
80%
(
12 of
15)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
10 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
5 of
22)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
30
Total Points Won
25
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 1 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 5 | Games Won | 3 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 0:40:0 | Average Match Time | 0:40:0 |
| 68% (15/22) | 1st Serve % | 45% (15/33) |
| 80% (12/15) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (10/15) |
| 71% (5/7) | 2nd Serve Win % | 56% (10/18) |
| 25% (1/4) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 39% (13/33) | Return Points Win % | 23% (5/22) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Cannon Kingsley Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
Player
Cannon Kingsley
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
76%
(
32 of
42)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Cannon Kingsley
57%
(
49 of
86)
1st Serve %
62%
(
50 of
81)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
32 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
38 of
81)
92
Total Points Won
75
|
6-1 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cannon Kingsley
Player
Robin Catry
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
54%
(
21 of
39)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
15 of
21)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
54
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Cannon Kingsley
Player
Seita Watanabe
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
45%
(
19 of
42)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andres Martin
Player
Cannon Kingsley
52%
(
48 of
92)
1st Serve %
61%
(
61 of
100)
0
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
5
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
40 of
61)
64%
(
28 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
27 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
100)
104
Total Points Won
88
|
6-1 6-7(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Henrik Bladelius
Player
Cannon Kingsley
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gastao Elias
Player
Cannon Kingsley
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
47%
(
35 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
72
|
4-6 7-5 10-6 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cannon Kingsley
Player
Markus Bolin
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve %
74%
(
34 of
46)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
13 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
46
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gastao Elias
Player
Cannon Kingsley
47%
(
43 of
91)
1st Serve %
66%
(
76 of
116)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
4
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
45 of
76)
42%
(
20 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
45%
(
41 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
54 of
116)
104
Total Points Won
103
|
6-7(3) 7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Felix Corwin
Player
Cannon Kingsley
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve %
70%
(
33 of
47)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
13 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
45
Total Points Won
38
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Martin Beran Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Cannon Kingsley
Player
Martin Beran
68%
(
15 of
22)
1st Serve %
45%
(
15 of
33)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
80%
(
12 of
15)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
10 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
5 of
22)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
30
Total Points Won
25
|
5-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Beran
Player
Michail Pervolarakis
54%
(
55 of
101)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
9
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
2
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
41%
(
41 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
83)
92
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dayne Kelly
Player
Martin Beran
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve %
63%
(
25 of
40)
0
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
60%
(
12 of
20)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
12 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
45
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Beran
Player
Matthew Dellavedova
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
9
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
100%
(
27 of
27)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
10%
(
4 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Beran
Player
Brydan Klein
65%
(
77 of
119)
1st Serve %
62%
(
80 of
130)
7
Aces
12
6
Double Faults
7
66%
(
51 of
77)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
58 of
80)
69%
(
29 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
10%
(
1 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
33%
(
39 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
46 of
130)
126
Total Points Won
123
|
3-6 7-6(1) 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 5-7 7-5 10-7 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Will Maher
Player
Martin Beran
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
5
Aces
14
0
Double Faults
4
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
32 of
42)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
23 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Beran
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve %
71%
(
53 of
75)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
25 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
75)
83
Total Points Won
73
|
5-7 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Beran
Player
Jake Delaney
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
69%
(
54 of
78)
12
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
17 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
78)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Millen Hurrion
Player
Martin Beran
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
69%
(
55 of
80)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
8 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (127/93) | Win/Loss | 52% (121/110) |
| 57% (285/219) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (279/247) |
| 54% (2575/2211) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (2513/2352) |
| 0.53 | Aces Per Game | 0.2 |
| 1240 | Aces Total | 464 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 420 | Total Double Faults | 326 |
| 1:31:39 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 429.69 | Average Opponent Rank | 417.32 |
| 62% (8381/13539) | 1st Serve % | 65% (4202/6465) |
| 72% (6005/8381) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (2849/4202) |
| 52% (2686/5157) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (1116/2263) |
| 41% (528/1293) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (213/560) |
| 39% (5283/13536) | Return Points Win % | 38% (2379/6329) |
| 58% (125/217) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (120/229) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 39% (24/62) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (25/53) |
| 51% (34/67) | Deciding Set Win % | 42% (28/66) |
| 87% (126/110) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (131/108) |
| 13% (126/16) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (131/23) |
| 18% (94/17) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (100/12) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
